As a professional editor of over 15 years, the most common technical question I hear from serious beginners is what software should I use for editing.  Now as of recent people have been starting to talk about DaVinci Resolve a lot more.  I use DaVinci Resolve all the time, but more for coloring, but it does seem like a promising software to learn for the future, especially because they have a free version, which always bring in more users, hence clients becoming more used to the program.  But I don’t use Resolve yet as I don’t think the shortcuts and organization fit editing quite as well as the two dominant editing systems in the industry right now: Adobe Premiere and Avid Media Composer.

This is about the strengths of each of these applications, in my opinion, and when I would choose to use one or the other.

Top 4 features in Adobe Premiere

1. Modern simple workflow  that is customizable and accessible.  You can use almost whatever codec, timecode, and type of video file you have and just start editing.  There are some limitations, but overall it is much more flexible and you can decide to make proxies or not.  It adapts to your workflow and allows you to adapt to the system you’re working on and the footage that you have.

2. The Adobe Suite integration is amazing.  There is no other company that does so many visuals as well as Adobe does.  Photoshop is the industry standard.  It is what everyone has used for years for still images.  It’s what Avid Media Composer is to video, but it has even more of a hold on the industry due to its flexibility and ease of use.  Same thing with After Effects and simple motion graphics.  It’s included in the suite and you can do so much in the program.  On top of that there are other great programs and all of this comes at the same price as Avid Media Composer.

3. The ease of editing still photos and simple motion graphics in Premiere is much more flexible and intuitive than the very old system of add ons and nesting that Avid Media Composer makes you do.  It took the ideas of Final Cut Pro 7 and took them to the next level when Apple went a different direction with their video editing program.

Exports are also much easier with a separate program Encoder, and the easily editable outputs.  It’s much simpler than Avid’s confusing export console where exports really tie up your whole system and it’s very slow at encoding.  Even when I work in Avid I usually create a quick export (maybe even a reference export where there is no render made) and then re-encode in Encoder.  

Encoder leaves out options in lieu of simplicity which can really be frustrating at times.  For example Avid does make different color spaces much easier to navigate, but timecode and resolution differences are simple and as straight forward as typing in the values you want in Premiere.

4. Finally the process of reconnecting and managing media is much easier in Premiere.  It’s the main reason why you want to edit there.  Not only can it handle any codec in the timeline naturally (although making proxies is still recommended no matter how powerful of a computer you’re using).  But you have the option to cut natively and it’s easy to connect and reconnect footage.  I should mention Resolve is even better at reconnecting footage as it’s almost automatic, but Premiere is modern and intuitive while Avid’s system is outdated, protective and it erases most of your original file names and folder structure which makes it difficult to figure out things for yourself in finder, which is a hell of a pain.

Because of this ease, Premiere doesn’t require a technical person on the project like Avid does.  This can save money.  You need someone experienced in Avid to run the technical aspects of the system, Premiere is much more quickly accessible and a quicker gateway into creating something in Post without studying too much about very technical facets of moviemaking.

Top 4 Features in Avid Media Composer

1. Avid has all the bells and whistles you can imagine needing for the job.  Although Avid can feel slower, it is more thoughtful and the tools in the end, as you learn them make you work faster, so you can get your ideas from your head to the timeline in the least amount of time.  It’s customizable and is the standard in editing because it seems they thought of everything.  I hear of editors all the time that learn of a new Avid tool after working for 15-20 years.  It does really seem like they listen to editors and are inclusive with ideas, never throwing away old ones, just adding to the toolbox you can use.

2. Markers and script synch are a godsend to anyone who uses them in their workflow.  Organizing scripts, and written information about footage is so easy to manage, export outside of Avid and compile different visual ways of looking at your footage.  First off for anyone who does paper cuts (which I really don’t love, but it’s a common workflow), Script Sync makes it so easy for anyone to quickly find footage from a transcript.  It uses technology to click on the word and it’ll bring you directly to the audio in the video.

On top of that, the marker system is easily editable, color coded and easily navigated in many ways.  You can export markers and send them to Producers, or use them internally using Avid’s search engine to create databases that you can bring elsewhere or search right within Avid.  When you’re making a program with hundreds of hours of footage, this capability can vastly, vastly improve your show as if you prepare properly and are organized, when it comes crunch time at the end of a project (as it always does), you can fix small problems in 15 minutes from your database, versus taking a day to find a phrase, or a specific B-ROLL shot.

On top of that because it’s so easy to edit, the markers are able to be used as a visual indicator on the timeline  You can visually show where interesting sections of the footage are, or color code by person or place to visually see in the timeline different information.  This does take time to prepare, but it’s so excellent and isnt’ as frustrating as Premiere’s uncomfortable marker panel.

3. Avid’s system seems to be everlasting.  Jon Alpert who I’ve worked with, made two movies that spanned about 30 years on and off in the edit room, and the Avid projects could always be recovered because they use the same system as back when Avid started.  The project files still open many versions later.  Editors once they learn Avid will always feel comfortable there. 

4. The main reason Avid is the best is because no matter how large the project gets, it’s still usable and still possible to keep together in one project or a smaller set of projects.  This is because Avid uses bins that hold some of the project’s information, but doesn’t tax the computer with opening the entire project’s information at all times.  Only when you have certain bins open are you reading the information and taxing your computer’s memory with that information.  This makes it feel like your always just working on a small bit of the project and makes everything manageable.

If you do happen to use multiple projects, you can easily transfer bins between projects as long as the media is available wherever  you’re bringing it.  This means Avid is so easy to use with a server on huge television projects, or series of any kind.  If you have full teams working together on complicated archival or cutting multiple shows at the same time, Avid is a no-brainer.  Premiere is a sports car meant for one or two people, whereas Avid is like a vehicle where you can always add an extra seat for anyone you want at a standard predictable costs of a computer and a license.

In the end, both systems have carved clear spaces for themselves in the industry.  Premiere on projects under 20 minutes, for speed of use, exporting ease, and ability to work in the Adobe Suite.  For commercial projects it’s just so much more simple when you’re exporting a lot and switching shoots and footage often enough that you just want to quickly edit, send a project away on a drive and be ready to work for an individual person who can execute in Post-Production.

Avid, I’d use for projects over 15 minutes where organization of the footage content matters most.  Where you expect to spend a lot of time with footage to mold it into perfection and likely are working in a larger team.  Especially projects that will last longer than two or three months.  It’s so worth it.

As a final note, DaVinci Resolve again, doesn’t beat either of these projects when editing, but it’s getting there to compete with Premiere.  Because it’s an industry standard in color correction and media management, the ease of using DaVinci Resolve can speed up finishing especially if you have an editor color the footage.  It takes out a variable of switching software one less time which is great.  It’s just not as comfortable in managing screen space for editing as it is organized for finishing and not for sifting through lots of clips.  So it definitely is not on the way of replacing Avid, but look out Premiere.  Work in here if you want to future-proof your workflow or add a skill to your résumé.

If you have any other questions about Post-Production, please contact me at justin.joseph.hall@fourwindfilms.com

Writer’s biography

Justin Joseph Hall has held positions as Editor for networks such as HBO, NBCUniversal, and PBS.  At Downtown Community Television he helped pitch and develop the show Axios (2018-2021), the Emmy-winning documentary series.  Abuela’s Luck (2018) was picked up by all HBO’s streaming platforms and slated to be adapted into a full-length feature movie.   His mastery of post-production and the visual arts has awarded him opportunities to work with Major League Baseball, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, National Geographic, Discovery, and BMW, to name a few.